Results
Verified recoveries. Measurable impact.
Every finding is validated by human analysts before being counted. These are real results from real engagements.
Case Studies
Anonymized but real.
Client confidentiality prevents us from naming names. But the patterns, numbers, and timelines below reflect actual engagement outcomes.
Case Study 01
Industrial Manufacturing
3.2%
Recovered
45 days
Timeline
A mid-market industrial manufacturer processing 15,000+ invoices annually across 200+ suppliers, with complex multi-year service contracts and recurring maintenance agreements.
Challenge
Finance team relied on manual spot-checks and ERP validation rules that couldn't detect cross-reference anomalies. Two terminated vendor contracts continued billing monthly for 14 months undetected.
Key Findings
- Duplicate invoices from 3 vendors exploiting different PO reference formats
- Post-termination billing on 2 maintenance contracts totaling $180K annually
- Systematic 3-7% price variance on commodity materials vs. contracted rates
- Unused equipment lease for a decommissioned production line
Case Study 02
SaaS-Heavy Tech Company
2.8%
Recovered
30 days
Timeline
A 400-person technology company with 200+ active SaaS subscriptions managed independently across engineering, marketing, sales, and operations departments.
Challenge
No centralized subscription management. Each department manager approved renewals independently. Auto-renewal defaults and decentralized purchasing created significant blind spots.
Key Findings
- 35% average license utilization across enterprise tools — 65% of seats unused
- 4 duplicate subscriptions for overlapping project management tools across teams
- Auto-renewed annual contracts on 12 tools that had cheaper alternatives or were unused
- Volume discount thresholds missed by consolidating 3 separate accounts with one vendor
Case Study 03
Multi-National Services
4.1%
Recovered
60 days
Timeline
A professional services firm operating across 4 European countries with centralized procurement but decentralized operations, processing invoices in EUR, GBP, CHF, and SEK.
Challenge
Currency conversions, varying VAT rates, and country-specific billing practices created layers of complexity that made systematic anomaly detection nearly impossible with existing tools.
Key Findings
- Systematic VAT miscalculation on cross-border services resulting in overpayments
- Currency conversion markups exceeding contracted FX rates by 1.5-3%
- Overbilling vs. purchase orders on 8% of invoices from 2 major IT service vendors
- Duplicate expense reimbursements across entities for shared project costs
Estimate
What could you recover?
Your annual spend
$20M
Potential recovery
$600K
Conservative
$400K
2% recovery rate
Average
$600K
3% recovery rate
Optimistic
$800K
4% recovery rate
Estimates based on typical engagement outcomes. Actual results vary by industry and data quality.
Ready to see what's hiding in your numbers?
Confidential. No obligation. Specific insights tailored to your industry.
Request a confidential discussionResponse within 24 hours. NDA available upon request.